Scientific Papers

Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies | Systematic Reviews


  • Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, Morrow SA, Benedict RH, Zipp F, et al. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024;403(10422):183–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01473-3.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, Rae-Grant AD. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(8):765–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26858. PMID: 33620411.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • GBD 2021 Nervous System Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024 Mar 5:S1474–4422(24)00038–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3. PMID: 38493795.

  • GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.

  • Multiple sclerosis in adults: management (NICE Guideline, No. 220). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2022. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng220 (accessed March 19, 2024).

  • Rae-Grant A, Day GS, Marrie RA, Rabinstein A, Cree BAC, Gronseth GS, et al. Practice guideline recommendations summary: disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018;90(17):777–88. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005347. PMID: 29686116.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Montalban X, Gold R, Thompson AJ, Otero-Romero S, Amato MP, Chandraratna D, et al. ECTRIMS/EAN Guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2018;24(2):96–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517751049. PMID: 29353550.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Health Organization. WHO endorses landmark public health decisions on essential medicines for multiple sclerosis. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/26-07-2023-who-endorses-landmark-public-health-decisions-on-essential-medicines-for-multiple-sclerosis (accessed March 19, 2024).

  • Laurson-Doube J, Helme A, Nonino F, Piggott T, Rijke N, Saylor D. WHO considers multiple sclerosis treatments essential. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(2):140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00505-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sumelahti ML, Pukkala E, Hakama M. Cancer incidence in multiple sclerosis: a 35-year follow-up. Neuroepidemiology. 2004;23(5):224–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079947. PMID: 15316248.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Achiron A, Barak Y, Gail M, Mandel M, Pee D, Ayyagari R, Rotstein Z. Cancer incidence in multiple sclerosis and effects of immunomodulatory treatments. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89(3):265–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-2229-4. PMID: 15754125.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nielsen NM, Rostgaard K, Rasmussen S, Koch-Henriksen N, Storm HH, Melbye M, et al. Cancer risk among patients with multiple sclerosis: a population-based register study. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(4):979–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21437. PMID: 16152598.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bahmanyar S, Montgomery SM, Hillert J, Ekbom A, Olsson T. Cancer risk among patients with multiple sclerosis and their parents. Neurology. 2009;72(13):1170–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000345366.10455.62. PMID: 19332695.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kingwell E, Bajdik C, Phillips N, Zhu F, Oger J, Hashimoto S, Tremlett H. Cancer risk in multiple sclerosis: findings from British Columbia. Canada Brain. 2012;135(Pt 10):2973–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws148. PMID: 22730559.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Handel AE, Ramagopalan SV. Multiple sclerosis and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(12):1413–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.195776. PMID: 20724517.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marrie RA, Reider N, Cohen J, Stuve O, Trojano M, Sorensen PS, Reingold SC, Cutter G. A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of cancer in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514564489. PMID: 25533302.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Catalá-López F, Suárez-Pinilla M, Suárez-Pinilla P, Valderas JM, Gómez-Beneyto M, Martinez S, et al. Inverse and direct cancer comorbidity in people with central nervous system disorders: a meta-analysis of cancer incidence in 577,013 participants of 50 observational studies. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(2):89–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356498. PMID: 24458030.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Confavreux C, Saddier P, Grimaud J, Moreau T, Adeleine P, Aimard G. Risk of cancer from azathioprine therapy in multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Neurology. 1996;46(6):1607–12. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.46.6.1607. PMID: 8649558.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lebrun C, Debouverie M, Vermersch P, Clavelou P, Rumbach L, de Seze J, et al. Cancer risk and impact of disease-modifying treatments in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2008;14(3):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458507083625. PMID: 18420778.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alping P, Askling J, Burman J, Fink K, Fogdell-Hahn A, Gunnarsson M, et al. Cancer risk for fingolimod, natalizumab, and rituximab in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(5):688–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25701. PMID: 32056253.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • La Mantia L, Benedetti MD, Sant M, d’Arma A, Di Tella S, Lillini R, et al. Cancer risk for multiple sclerosis patients treated with azathioprine and disease-modifying therapies: an Italian observational study. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(12):5157–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05216-z. PMID: 33791892.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greenfield J, Metz LM, Khakban A, Llorian ER, Michaux KD, Traboulsee A, et al. Cancer risk, disease-modifying therapy, and age in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;80 PMID: 37924714.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pakpoor J, Disanto G, Altmann DR, Pavitt S, Turner BP, Marta M, et al. No evidence for higher risk of cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis taking cladribine. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015;2(6) PMID: 26468472.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Papadopoulos D, Gklinos P, Psarros G, Drellia K, Delicha EM, Friede T, et al. Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis have not affected the incidence of neoplasms in clinical trials over 3 decades: a meta-analysis with meta-regression. J Neurol. 2022;269(6):3226–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10932-9. PMID: 35066607.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tramacere I, Virgili G, Perduca V, Lucenteforte E, Benedetti MD, Capobussi M, et al. Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;11(11):CD012186. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012186.pub2. PMID: 38032059.

  • Lebrun C, Rocher F. Cancer risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: potential impact of disease-modifying drugs. CNS Drugs. 2018;32(10):939–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0564-y. PMID: 30143945.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mavenclad (cladribine). European public assessment report (EPAR). Last updated: 23/01/2024. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency (EMA); 2024. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/mavenclad (accessed March 19, 2024).

  • Gilenya (fingolimod). European public assessment report (EPAR). Last updated: 15/09/2023. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency (EMA); 2023. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/gilenya (accessed March 19, 2024).

  • Tysabri (natalizumab). European public assessment report (EPAR). Last updated: 21/02/2024. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency (EMA); 2024. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/tysabri (accessed March 19, 2024).

  • Lemtrada (alentuzumab). European public assessment report (EPAR). Last updated: 05/01/2024. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency (EMA); 2024. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/lemtrada (accessed March 19, 2024)

  • Ocrevus (ocrelizumab). European public assessment report (EPAR). Last updated: 13/04/2023. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency (EMA); 2023. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/ocrevus (accessed March 19, 2024)

  • Hou J, Karin M, Sun B. Targeting cancer-promoting inflammation – have anti-inflammatory therapies come of age? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(5):261–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-00459-9. PMID: 33469195.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cuzick J, Otto F, Baron JA, Brown PH, Burn J, Greenwald P, Jankowski J, et al. Aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cancer prevention: an international consensus statement. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):501–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70035-X. PMID: 19410194.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rothwell PM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Price JF, Belch JFF, Roncaglioni MC, et al. Effects of aspirin on risks of vascular events and cancer according to bodyweight and dose: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10145):387–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31133-4. PMID: 30017552.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rothwell PM, Fowkes FG, Belch JF, Ogawa H, Warlow CP, Meade TW. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;377(9759):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62110-1. PMID: 21144578.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350: g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zorzela L, Loke YK, Ioannidis JP, Golder S, Santaguida P, Altman DG, et al. PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2016;352: i157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i157.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. Available at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed March 19, 2024)

  • Glanville J, Foxlee R, Wisniewski S, Noel-Storr A, Edwards M, Dooley G. Translating the Cochrane EMBASE RCT filter from the Ovid interface to Embase.com: a case study. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36(3):264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12269. PMID: 31328866.

  • Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366 PMID: 31462531.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses; 2008. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed March 19, 2024)

  • Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985;27(5):335–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7. PMID: 2858114.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Russell LA. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med. 2007;26(1):53–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2528.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. PMID: 3802833.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schünemann HJ, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Elie A Akl EA, Nicole Skoetz N, et al. Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5. Cochrane Collaboration, 2024. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-14

  • Santesso N, Carrasco-Labra A, Langendam M, Brignardello-Petersen R, Mustafa RA, Heus P, et al. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;74:28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.006. PMID: 26796947.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Santesso N, Glenton C, Dahm P, Garner P, Akl EA, Alper B, et al. GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;119:126–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014. PMID: 31711912.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harbord RM, Higgins JPT. Meta-regression in Stata. Stata J. 2008;8(4):493–519.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White MC, Holman DM, Boehm JE, Peipins LA, Grossman M, Henley SJ. Age and cancer risk: a potentially modifiable relationship. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(3 Suppl 1):S7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.029. PMID: 24512933.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. PMID: 9310563.

    Article 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994D;50(4):1088–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446. PMID: 7786990.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2023.

  • Palmer TM, Sterne JAC, Newton HJ, Cox NJ, editors. Meta-analysis in Stata: an updated collection from the Stata journal. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2016.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Ridley B, Minozzi S, Del Giovane C, Peryer G, Piggott T, et al. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;1(1):CD011381. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3. PMID: 38174776.

  • Filippini G, Del Giovane C, Clerico M, Beiki O, Mattoscio M, Piazza F, et al. Treatment with disease-modifying drugs for people with a first clinical attack suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):CD012200. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012200.pub2. PMID: 28440858.

  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.PMID:33781348;PMCID:PMC8008539.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372 PMID: 33781993.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link