Scientific Papers

Enhancing the implementation and integration of mHealth interventions in resource-limited settings: a scoping review | Implementation Science


  • Manyati TK, Mutsau M. A systematic review of the factors that hinder the scale up of mobile health technologies in antenatal care programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev. 2021;13(1):125–31.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Opoku D, Stephani V, Quentin W. A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):1–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deepa M, Shruti M, Mohan V. Reducing the global burden of diabetes using mobile health. Diabetes Digital Health: Elsevier; 2020. p. 3–23.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tumuhimbise W, Musiimenta A. A review of mobile health interventions for public private mix in tuberculosis care. Internet Interv. 2021;25: 100417.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osei E, Mashamba-Thompson TP. Mobile health applications for disease screening and treatment support in low-and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2021;7(3):e06639.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ITU. Mobile cellular subscriptions – Low & middle income 2021 [cited 2023 6th June]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS?end=2021&locations=XO&start=1960&view=chart.

  • UNPD. Population, total – Low & middle income. United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects: 2022 Revision 2022 [cited 2023 12th June]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=XO.

  • May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loman SL, Rodriguez BJ, Horner RH. Sustainability of a targeted intervention package: first step to success in Oregon. J Emot Behav Disord. 2010;18(3):178–91.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kao C-K, Liebovitz DM. Consumer mobile health apps: current state, barriers, and future directions. PM&R. 2017;9(5):S106–15.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chamberlain S. Pilot-itis: What’s the cure? : GSMA; 2012 [cited 2023 12th December]. Available from: https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/programme/mhealth/pilot-itis-whats-the-cure/.

  • Riley WT, Glasgow RE, Etheredge L, Abernethy AP. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clin Transl Med. 2013;2(1):1–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ben-Zeev D, Schueller SM, Begale M, Duffecy J, Kane JM, Mohr DC. Strategies for mHealth research: lessons from 3 mobile intervention studies. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2015;42:157–67.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Govasli L, Solvoll BA. Nurses’ experiences of busyness in their daily work. Nurs Inq. 2020;27(3): e12350.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yami A, Hamza L, Hassen A, Jira C, Sudhakar M. Job satisfaction and its determinants among health workers in jimma university specialized hospital, southwest ethiopia. Ethiopian J Health Sci. 2011;21:19–27.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tung TH, Hsiung MC. Work fatigue in a hospital setting: the experience at cheng hsin general hospital. In Healthcare 2021;9(6):776. MDPI.

  • Ghorrabi AT, Kakemam E, Moradi-Joo E, Dehcheshmeh NF. Challenges of the organizational structure of county health network in Iran: findings from a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):712.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • WHO. Physicians (per 1,000 people) – Low & middle income. World Health Organization’s Global Health Workforce Statistics, OECD, supplemented by country data. 2018 [cited 2023 12th June]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.PHYS.ZS?locations=XO.

  • Bong C-L, Brasher C, Chikumba E, McDougall R, Mellin-Olsen J, Enright A. The COVID-19 pandemic: effects on low-and middle-income countries. Anesthesia Analg. 2020;131(1):86–92.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lobelo F, Kelli HM, Tejedor SC, Pratt M, McConnell MV, Martin SS, et al. The wild wild west: a framework to integrate mHealth software applications and wearables to support physical activity assessment, counseling and interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(6):584–94.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly. 2003;4:425–78.

  • Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):1–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–12.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44(2):119–27.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(2):117–23.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernández D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Benrimoj SI. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2015;13(1):16.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MA, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation science. 2022;17(1):75.

  • El Joueidi S, Bardosh K, Musoke R, Tilahun B, Abo Moslim M, Gourlay K, MacMullin A, Cook VJ, Murray M, Mbaraga G, Nsanzimana S. Evaluation of the implementation process of the mobile health platform ‘WelTel’in six sites in East Africa and Canada using the modified consolidated framework for implementation research (mCFIR). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak . 2021;21:1–5.

  • May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–54.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, et al. Using normalization process theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):1–27.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel. A guide to designing interventions. 2014;1:1003–10.

  • Ayakaka I, Ackerman S, Ggita JM, Kajubi P, Dowdy D, Haberer JE, et al. Identifying barriers to and facilitators of tuberculosis contact investigation in Kampala, Uganda: a behavioral approach. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):33.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):42.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeiler M, Kuso S, Nacke B, Klesges LM, Waldherr K. Evaluating reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of Internet-based interventions to prevent eating disorders in adolescents: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31(Supplement_1):i38–47.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Asare M, Popelsky B, Akowuah E, Lanning BA, Montealegre JR. Internal and external validity of social media and mobile technology-driven HPV vaccination interventions: systematic review using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Vaccines. 2021;9(3):197.

  • Ashley BS, Chelsea SW, Melissa SS. Understanding the use of digital technology to promote human papillomavirus vaccination – A RE-AIM framework approach. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7–8):1549–61.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Powell B, Waltz T, Chinman M, Damschroder L, Smith J, Matthieu M, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science. 2015;10(21).

  • Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation: Sage; 1989.

  • Tumuhimbise W, Atwine D, Kaggwa F, Musiimenta A. Enhancing tuberculosis care in southwestern Uganda: Facilitators and barriers to utilizing mobile health technologies. Global Implementation Research and Applications. 2022:1–11.

  • Tumuhimbise W, Atwine D, Kaggwa F, Musiimenta A. Acceptability and feasibility of a mobile health application for enhancing public private mix for TB care among healthcare Workers in Southwestern Uganda. BMC Digital Health. 2023;1(1):1–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tumuhimbise W, Musiimenta A. Barriers and Motivators of Private Hospitals’ Engagement in Tuberculosis Care in Uganda. Global Implementation Research and Applications. 2021;1(4):279–90.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tumuhimbise W. A Mobile Health Framework for Public Private Mix in Tuberculosis Prevention and Care in Southwestern Uganda 2022.

  • Hafez A, Wang Y. A training social media mobile app prototype for the elderly: a pilot study. InAdvances in Usability and User Experience: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conferences on Usability
    & User Experience, and Human Factors and Assistive Technology, July 24-28, 2019. Washington: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 188–197.

  • Larsen GD. Understanding the early stages of the innovation diffusion process: awareness, influence and communication networks. Construction Manage Econ. 2011;29(10):987–1002.

  • Ahtinen A, Mattila E, Välkkynen P, Kaipainen K, Vanhala T, Ermes M, et al. Mobile mental wellness training for stress management: feasibility and design implications based on a one-month field study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1(2): e2596.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hayes S, Luoma J, Bond F, Masuda A, Lillis J. Behaviour research and therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44:1–25.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med . 2009;360(15):1477–9.

  • Musiimenta A, Tumuhimbise W, Pinkwart N, Katusiime J, Mugyenyi G, Atukunda EC. A mobile phone-based multimedia intervention to support maternal health is acceptable and feasible among illiterate pregnant women in Uganda: Qualitative findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Digital Health. 2021;7:2055207620986296.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):1–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diez-Canseco F, Toyama M, Ipince A, Perez-Leon S, Cavero V, Araya R, et al. Integration of a technology-based mental health screening program into routine practices of primary health care services in Peru (The Allillanchu Project): development and implementation. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3): e100.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Musiimenta A, Tumuhimbise W, Atukunda E, Mugaba A, Linnemayr S, Haberer JE. Digital Adherence Technologies and Mobile Money Incentives for Management of Tuberculosis Medication among People Living with Tuberculosis: A Mixed Methods Formative Study. JMIR Formative Research. 2023;45301.

  • Qader AN. The effect of Non-Monetary Incentives & work environment on employee’s job satisfaction. Studies of Applied Economics. 2021;39(7).

  • Brower J, LaBarge MC, White L, Mitchell MS. Examining responsiveness to an incentive-based Mobile health app: longitudinal observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8): e16797.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saghafian M, Laumann K, Skogstad MR. Stagewise overview of issues influencing organizational technology adoption and use. Front Psychol. 2021;12: 630145.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cummings TG, Worley CG. Organization development & change (15. Aufl.). Stamford: Cengage Learning; 2015. p 169.

  • Basu S. Effective contact tracing for COVID-19 using mobile phones: an ethical analysis of the mandatory use of the Aarogya Setu application in India. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021;30(2):262–71.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, Gostin LO, Kahn J, Bonnie RJ, Kass NE, Mastroianni AC, Moreno JD, Nieburg P. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J L Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):170–8.

  • Harricharan M, Gemen R, Celemín LF, Fletcher D, de Looy AE, Wills J, et al. Integrating mobile technology with routine dietetic practice: the case of myPace for weight management. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2015;74(2):125–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wexler C. Using technology to better manage long-term conditions 2013 [cited 2024 7th October]. Available from: https://www.hsj.co.uk/technology-and-innovation/using-technology-to-better-manage-long-term-conditions/5053767.article.

  • Nundy S, Dick JJ, Goddu AP, Hogan P, Lu C-YE, Solomon MC, et al. Using mobile health to support the chronic care model: developing an institutional initiative. International journal of telemedicine and applications. 2012;2012:18-.

  • Ploeg J, Wong ST, Hassani K, Yous M-L, Fortin M, Kendall C, et al. Contextual factors influencing the implementation of innovations in community-based primary health care: the experience of 12 Canadian research teams. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2019;20: e107.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Understanding clinicians’ adoption of mobile health tools: a qualitative review of the most used frameworks. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(7): e18072.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shackel B. Usability – context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact Comput. 2009;21(339–346).

  • Brunner M, Rietdijk R, Togher L. Training Resources Targeting Social Media Skills to Inform Rehabilitation for People Who Have an Acquired Brain Injury: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(4): e35595.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brunner MJ. # TwitterMind‐Social Media Use by People with Communication Difficulties after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) 2020.

  • Greve M, Brendel AB, van Osten N, Kolbe LM. Overcoming the barriers of mobile health that hamper sustainability in low-resource environments. J Public Health. 2022;30(1):49–62.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Council NR. Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities2009.

  • Sittenthaler HM, Mohnen A. Cash, non-cash, or mix? Gender matters! The impact of monetary, non-monetary, and mixed incentives on performance. J Bus Econ. 2020;90(8):1253–84.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zakerabasali S, Ayyoubzadeh SM, Baniasadi T, Yazdani A, Abhari S. Mobile health technology and healthcare providers: systemic barriers to adoption. Healthc Inform Res. 2021;27(4):267–78.

  • Haffajee RL, Jena AB, Weiner SG. Mandatory use of prescription drug monitoring programs. JAMA. 2015;313(9):891–2.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wen H, Hockenberry JM, Jeng PJ, Bao Y. Prescription drug monitoring program mandates: impact on opioid prescribing and related hospital use. Health Aff. 2019;38(9):1550–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • NAMSDL. National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws. Prescription drug monitoring programs. Harrisburg (PA)2019 [cited 2023 24th May ]. Available from: https://namsdl.org/topics/pdmp/?fwp_pdmpsub=pdmp_access&fwp_document_source=namsdl.

  • Bechtel JM, Lepoire E, Bauer AM, Bowen DJ, Fortney JC. Care manager perspectives on integrating an mHealth app system into clinical workflows: a mixed methods study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 20211;68:38–45.

  • Wattanapisit A, Amaek W, Wattanapisit S, Tuangratananon T, Wongsiri S, Pengkaew P. Challenges of implementing an mhealth application for personalized physical activity counselling in primary health care: A qualitative study. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:3821–31.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link