Schwendimann R, Blatter C, Dhaini S, Simon M, Ausserhofer D. The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events – a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res Dezember. 2018;18(1):521.
Fan CJ, Chien HL, Weiss MJ, He J, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL. u. a. minimally invasive versus open surgery in the Medicare population: a comparison of post-operative and economic outcomes. Surg Endosc September. 2018;32(9):3874–80.
Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Estimation of the Acquisition and operating costs for robotic surgery. JAMA 28 August. 2018;320(8):835.
Navaratnam A, Abdul-Muhsin H, Humphreys M. Updates in urologic Robot assisted surgery. F1000Research. 18. Dezember 2018;7:1948.
Thüroff JW. Laparoskopische vs. robotische Operationen in Der Urologie. Urol Mai. 2012;51(5):615–6.
Ramsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, Close A, Vale L, Armstrong N. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess November 2012 [zitiert 9. April 2023];16(41). Verfügbar unter: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta16410/
Kuklinski D, Vogel J, Henschke C, Pross C, Geissler A. Robotic-assisted surgery for prostatectomy – does the diffusion of robotic systems contribute to treatment centralization and influence patients’ hospital choice? Health Econ Rev 10 Mai. 2023;13(1):29.
Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Purushotham A, Sullivan R, Van Der Meulen J. Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study. Lancet Oncol November. 2017;18(11):1445–53.
Ekrutt J, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Knipper S, Schramm F, Beyer B, Maurer T. u. a. increasing the attractiveness of surgical disciplines for students: implications of a robot-assisted hands-on training course for medical education. Front Surg 21 Juli. 2022;9:953565.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. u. a. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin Mai. 2021;71(3):209–49.
Litwin MS, Tan HJ. The diagnosis and treatment of prostate Cancer: a review. JAMA 27 Juni. 2017;317(24):2532.
Klauber J, Günster C, Gerste B, Robra BP, Schmacke N. Versorgungs-Report 2015/2016.
Schrader AJ, Müller J, Janssen M, Krabbe LM. Die radikale Prostatektomie Im Wandel Der Zeit. Aktuelle Urol September. 2019;50(05):486–90.
Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, Wang Y, Hanske J, Sammon JD. u. a. Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Eur Urol November. 2016;70(5):837–45.
De Carlo F, Celestino F, Verri C, Masedu F, Liberati E, Di Stasi SM, Retropubic. Laparoscopic, and Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Surgical, Oncological, and functional outcomes: a systematic review. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):373–83.
Aron M. Robotic surgery beyond the prostate. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(3):273.
Hughes T, Rai B, Madaan S, Chedgy E, Somani B. The availability, cost, limitations, learning curve and future of Robotic systems in urology and prostate Cancer surgery. J Clin Med. März 2023;15(6):2268.
Moretti TBC, Magna LA, Reis LO. Surgical results and complications for Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a reverse systematic review. Eur Urol Open Sci Oktober. 2022;44:150–61.
Sancı A, Özkaya MF, Oguz ES, Gokce Mİ, Süer E. Gülpinar O, u. a. perioperative adverse events and functional outcomes following open and robot-assisted prostatectomy in patients over age 70. Int J Clin Pract November. 2021;75(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14754. [zitiert 15. Oktober 2023];. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/. Verfügbar unter.
Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA, Schrag D, Klein EA. u. a. The Surgical Learning curve for prostate Cancer Control after Radical Prostatectomy. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 1 August. 2007;99(15):1171–7.
Leijte E, De Blaauw I, Van Workum F, Rosman C, Botden S. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting. Surg Endosc August. 2020;34(8):3679–89.
Blonde L, Khunti K, Harris SB, Meizinger C, Skolnik NS. Interpretation and impact of real-world Clinical Data for the practicing clinician. Adv Ther November. 2018;35(11):1763–74.
Beckmann K, Garmo H, Franck Lissbrant I, Stattin P. The value of real-World Data in understanding prostate Cancer risk and improving clinical care: examples from Swedish registries. Cancers 19 Februar. 2021;13(4):875.
Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS). Medizinisches Kodierungshandbuch. Der offizielle Leitfaden der Kodierrichtlinien in der Schweiz. Neuchâtel 2022: Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS); 2022 [zitiert 31. Juli 2023]. (Statistik der Schweiz). Verfügbar unter: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/gesundheit/nomenklaturen/medkk/instrumente-medizinische-kodierung.assetdetail.23446572.html
Statistik Bfür. Bundesamt für Statistik. 2017 [zitiert 8. April 2023]. Schweizerische Operationsklassifikation (CHOP) – Systematisches Verzeichnis – Version 2018 | Publikation. Verfügbar unter: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/de/1940914
DIMDI – ICD. -10-GM Version 2018. [zitiert 8. April 2023]. Verfügbar unter: https://www.dimdi.de/static/de/klassifikationen/icd/icd-10-gm/kode-suche/htmlgm2018/
Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Januar. Comorbidity measures for Use with Administrative Data: Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.
Sharma N, Schwendimann R, Endrich O, Ausserhofer D, Simon M. Comparing Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices with different weightings to predict in-hospital mortality: an analysis of national inpatient data. BMC Health Serv Res Dezember. 2021;21(1):13.
SwissDRG AG. Regeln und Definitionen zur Fallabrechnung unter SwissDRG und TARPSY. 2021. Verfügbar unter: https://www.swissdrg.org/application/files/7716/3819/0804/Regeln_und_Definitionen_zur_Fallabrechnung_unter_SwissDRG_und_TARPSY.pdf
Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Urology Group, Herausgeber. Cochrane Database Syst rev. 12. September 2017 [zitiert 5. November 2023];2017(9). Verfügbar unter: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2
Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L. u. a. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol August. 2018;19(8):1051–60.
Ploussard G, Grabia A, Beauval JB, Mathieu R, Brureau L, Rozet F. u. a. impact of hospital volume on postoperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a 5-Year nationwide database analysis. Eur Urol Focus September. 2022;8(5):1169–75.
Baboudjian M, Grabia A, Barret E, Mathieu R, Rozet F, Lequeu CE. Real-life Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy using the French National Registry: a Plea for Promotion of Centralized Care and Access to minimally invasive approaches. Eur Urol Oncol. Oktober 2023;S2588931123002225.
Dalsgaard T, Jensen MD, Hartwell D, Mosgaard BJ, Jørgensen A, Jensen BR. Robotic surgery is less physically demanding Than laparoscopic surgery: Paired Cross Sectional Study. Ann Surg Januar. 2020;271(1):106–13.
Mellhammar L, Wollter E, Dahlberg J, Donovan B, Olséen CJ, Wiking PO. u. a. estimating Sepsis incidence using Administrative Data and Clinical Medical Record Review. JAMA Netw Open 29 August. 2023;6(8):e2331168.
Schwarzkopf D, Rose N, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Boden B, Dorow H, Edel A. u. a. understanding the biases to sepsis surveillance and quality assurance caused by inaccurate coding in administrative health data. Infect April. 2024;52(2):413–27.
Rhee C, Gohil S, Klompas M. Regulatory mandates for Sepsis Care — reasons for caution. N Engl J Med Mai. 2014;370(18):1673–6.
Bekker J, Davis J. Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a survey. Mach Learn April. 2020;109(4):719–60.
Vogel J, Cordier J. Application of positive and unlabeled learning: A novel approach for identifying sepsis cases from hospital administrative data. University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management, St.Gallen; 2024 [zitiert 13. August 2024]. Verfügbar unter: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/300110
Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Huland H, Graefen M, Beyer B. Qualitätskriterien in Der Urologie: Wie Kann Eine Vergleichbarkeit Der Ergebnisse Geschaffen Werden? Urol Februar. 2021;60(2):193–8.
Stranne J, Axen E, Franck-Lissbrant I, Fransson P, Frånlund M, Hugosson J. u. a. single institution followed by national implementation of systematic surgical quality control and feedback for radical prostatectomy: a 20-year journey. World J Urol Juni. 2020;38(6):1397–411.
Add Comment