Goh WWB, Yong CH, Wong L. Are batch effects still relevant in the age of big data? Trends Biotechnol. 2022;40:1029–40.
Cuklina J, Lee CH, Williams EG, Sajic T, Collins BC, Rodriguez Martinez M, et al. Diagnostics and correction of batch effects in large-scale proteomic studies: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol. 2021;17:e10240.
Goh WWB, Wang W, Wong L. Why batch effects matter in omics data, and how to avoid them. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35:498–507.
Lazar C, Meganck S, Taminau J, Steenhoff D, Coletta A, Molter C, et al. Batch effect removal methods for microarray gene expression data integration: a survey. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:469–90.
Maceda I, Lao O. Analysis of the batch effect due to sequencing center in population statistics quantifying rare events in the 1000 genomes project. Genes (Basel). 2021;13:44.
Wickland DP, Ren Y, Sinnwell JP, Reddy JS, Pottier C, Sarangi V, et al. Impact of variant-level batch effects on identification of genetic risk factors in large sequencing studies. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0249305.
Anderson-Trocme L, Farouni R, Bourgey M, Kamatani Y, Higasa K, Seo JS, et al. Legacy data confound genomics studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:2–10.
Rasnic R, Brandes N, Zuk O, Linial M. Substantial batch effects in TCGA exome sequences undermine pan-cancer analysis of germline variants. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:783.
Mars RAT, Yang Y, Ward T, Houtti M, Priya S, Lekatz HR, et al. Longitudinal multi-omics reveals subset-specific mechanisms underlying irritable Bowel syndrome. Cell. 2020;183:1137–40.
Banchereau R, Hong S, Cantarel B, Baldwin N, Baisch J, Edens M, et al. Personalized immunomonitoring uncovers molecular networks that stratify lupus patients. Cell. 2016;165:1548–50.
Han W, Li L. Evaluating and minimizing batch effects in metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2020;41:421–42.
Ugidos M, Nueda MJ, Prats-Montalban JM, Ferrer A, Conesa A, Tarazona S. MultiBaC: an R package to remove batch effects in multi-omic experiments. Bioinformatics. 2022;38:2657–8.
Zheng Y, Liu Y, Yang J, Dong L, Zhang R, Tian S, et al. Multi-omics data integration using ratio-based quantitative profiling with Quartet reference materials. Nat Biotechnol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-41023-01934-41581.
Chen W, Zhao Y, Chen X, Yang Z, Xu X, Bi Y, et al. A multicenter study benchmarking single-cell RNA sequencing technologies using reference samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1103–14.
Tran HTN, Ang KS, Chevrier M, Zhang X, Lee NYS, Goh M, et al. A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2020;21:12.
Freedman LP, Inglese J. The increasing urgency for standards in basic biologic research. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4024–9.
Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184:3573–3587 e3529.
Eddy S, Mariani LH, Kretzler M. Integrated multi-omics approaches to improve classification of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:657–68.
Hasin Y, Seldin M, Lusis A. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol. 2017;18:83.
Rosellini M, Marchetti A, Mollica V, Rizzo A, Santoni M, Massari F. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Urol. 2023;20:133–57.
Hassan M, Awan FM, Naz A, deAndres-Galiana EJ, Alvarez O, Cernea A, et al. Innovations in genomics and big data analytics for personalized medicine and health care: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:4645.
Jiang P, Sinha S, Aldape K, Hannenhalli S, Sahinalp C, Ruppin E. Big data in basic and translational cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:625–39.
Montaner J, Ramiro L, Simats A, Tiedt S, Makris K, Jickling GC, et al. Multilevel omics for the discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets for stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:247–64.
Li Y, Ma Y, Wang K, Zhang M, Wang Y, Liu X, et al. Using composite phenotypes to reveal hidden physiological heterogeneity in high-altitude acclimatization in a Chinese Han longitudinal cohort. Phenomics. 2021;1:3–14.
Xia Q, Thompson JA, Koestler DC. pwrBRIDGE: a user-friendly web application for power and sample size estimation in batch-confounded microarray studies with dependent samples. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2022;21:20220003.
Chen G, Ning B, Shi T. Single-cell RNA-seq technologies and related computational data analysis. Front Genet. 2019;10:317.
Yip SH, Sham PC, Wang J. Evaluation of tools for highly variable gene discovery from single-cell RNA-seq data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1583–9.
Phua SX, Lim KP, Goh WW. Perspectives for better batch effect correction in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:4369–75.
Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HC, Simcha D, Langmead B, Johnson WE, et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:733–9.
Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Speed TP. Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data. Biostatistics. 2012;13:539–52.
Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8:118–27.
Yu Y, Zhang N, Mai Y, Chen Q, Cao Z, Chen Q, et al. Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomic studies using a reference-material-based ratio method. Genome Biol. 2023;24:201.
Zhou W, Koudijs KKM, Bohringer S. Influence of batch effect correction methods on drug induced differential gene expression profiles. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20:437.
Li S, Labaj PP, Zumbo P, Sykacek P, Shi W, Shi L, et al. Detecting and correcting systematic variation in large-scale RNA sequencing data. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:888–95.
Li S, Tighe SW, Nicolet CM, Grove D, Levy S, Farmerie W, et al. Multi-platform assessment of transcriptome profiling using RNA-seq in the ABRF next-generation sequencing study. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:915–25.
Luo J, Schumacher M, Scherer A, Sanoudou D, Megherbi D, Davison T, et al. A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10:278–91.
Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, et al. 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:717–29.
Lin S, Lin Y, Nery JR, Urich MA, Breschi A, Davis CA, et al. Comparison of the transcriptional landscapes between human and mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:17224–9.
Gilad Y, MizrahiMan O. A reanalysis of mouse ENCODE comparative gene expression data. F1000Res. 2015;4:121.
Mullard A. Half of top cancer studies fail high-profile reproducibility effort. Nature. 2021;600:368–9.
Errington TM, Mathur M, Soderberg CK, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E, et al. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. Elife. 2021;10:e71601.
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:452–4.
Freedman LP, Cockburn IM, Simcoe TS. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002165.
Zhang S, Li X, Zhao S, Drobizhev M, Ai HW. Retraction note: a fast, high-affinity fluorescent serotonin biosensor engineered from a tick lipocalin. Nat Methods. 2021;18:575.
Yano Y, Mitoma N, Matsushima K, Wang F, Matsui K, Takakura A, et al. Retraction note: living annulative pi-extension polymerization for graphene nanoribbon synthesis. Nature. 2020;588:180.
Zhang S, Li X, Zhao S, Drobizhev M, Ai HW. A fast, high-affinity fluorescent serotonin biosensor engineered from a tick lipocalin. Nat Methods. 2021;18:258–61.
Errington TM, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E, Nosek BA. Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. Elife. 2021;10:10.
Foox J, Tighe SW, Nicolet CM, Zook JM, Byrska-Bishop M, Clarke WE, et al. Performance assessment of DNA sequencing platforms in the ABRF next-generation sequencing study. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1129–40.
Molania R, Foroutan M, Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Gandolfo LC, Jain A, Sinha A, et al. Removing unwanted variation from large-scale RNA sequencing data with PRPS. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41:82–95.
Freedman LP, Venugopalan G, Wisman R. Reproducibility 2020: progress and priorities. F1000Res. 2017;6:604.
Wang C, Gong B, Bushel PR, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Xu J, et al. The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:926–32.
Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1113–26.
Su Y, Chen D, Yuan D, Lausted C, Choi J, Dai CL, et al. Multi-omics resolves a sharp disease-state shift between mild and moderate COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183(1479–1495):e1420.
Geyer PE, Holdt LM, Teupser D, Mann M. Revisiting biomarker discovery by plasma proteomics. Mol Syst Biol. 2017;13:942.
Halvey P, Farutin V, Koppes L, Gunay NS, Pappas DA, Manning AM, et al. Variable blood processing procedures contribute to plasma proteomic variability. Clin Proteomics. 2021;18:5.
Abraham RA, Agrawal PK, Acharya R, Sarna A, Ramesh S, Johnston R, et al. Effect of temperature and time delay in centrifugation on stability of select biomarkers of nutrition and non-communicable diseases in blood samples. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019;29:020708.
Jonasdottir HS, Brouwers H, Toes REM, Ioan-Facsinay A, Giera M. Effects of anticoagulants and storage conditions on clinical oxylipid levels in human plasma. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2018;1863:1511–22.
Oddoze C, Lombard E, Portugal H. Stability study of 81 analytes in human whole blood, in serum and in plasma. Clin Biochem. 2012;45:464–9.
Xue VW, Ng SSM, Leung WW, Ma BBY, Cho WCS, Au TCC, et al. The effect of centrifugal force in quantification of colorectal cancer-related mRNA in plasma using targeted sequencing. Front Genet. 2018;9:165.
Wong SC, Ma BB, Lai PB, Ng SS, Lee JF, Hui EP, et al. The effect of centrifugation on circulating mRNA quantitation opens up a new scenario in expression profiling from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Biochem. 2007;40:1277–84.
Zimmermann M, Traxler D, Simader E, Bekos C, Dieplinger B, Lainscak M, et al. In vitro stability of heat shock protein 27 in serum and plasma under different pre-analytical conditions: implications for large-scale clinical studies. Ann Lab Med. 2016;36:353–7.
Lippi G, Lima-Oliveira G, Brocco G, Bassi A, Salvagno GL. Estimating the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of manual pipetting. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55:962–6.
Bobryk S, Goossen L. Variation in pipetting may lead to the decreased detection of antibodies in manual gel testing. Clin Lab Sci. 2011;24:161–6.
Pandya K, Ray CA, Brunner L, Wang J, Lee JW, DeSilva B. Strategies to minimize variability and bias associated with manual pipetting in ligand binding assays to assure data quality of protein therapeutic quantification. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;53:623–30.
Ambardar S, Gupta R, Trakroo D, Lal R, Vakhlu J. High throughput sequencing: an overview of sequencing chemistry. Indian J Microbiol. 2016;56:394–404.
Xiao W, Ren L, Chen Z, Fang LT, Zhao Y, Lack J, et al. Toward best practice in cancer mutation detection with whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1141–50.
Stark R, Grzelak M, Hadfield J. RNA sequencing: the teenage years. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:631–56.
Conesa A, Madrigal P, Tarazona S, Gomez-Cabrero D, Cervera A, McPherson A, et al. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 2016;17:13.
Yu Y, Hou W, Wang H, Dong L, Liu Y, Sun S, et al. Quartet RNA reference materials improve the quality of transcriptomic data through ratio-based profiling. Nat Biotechnol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-41023-01867-41589.
Mereu E, Lafzi A, Moutinho C, Ziegenhain C, McCarthy DJ, Alvarez-Varela A, et al. Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:747–55.
Dal Molin A, Di Camillo B. How to design a single-cell RNA-sequencing experiment: pitfalls, challenges and perspectives. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1384–94.
Kolodziejczyk AA, Kim JK, Svensson V, Marioni JC, Teichmann SA. The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. Mol Cell. 2015;58:610–20.
Su Z, Łabaj PP, Li S, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Shi W, et al. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the sequencing quality control consortium. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:903–14.
Sprang M, Andrade-Navarro MA, Fontaine JF. Batch effect detection and correction in RNA-seq data using machine-learning-based automated assessment of quality. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022;23:279.
Li X, Zhang P, Wang H, Yu Y. Genes expressed at low levels raise false discovery rates in RNA samples contaminated with genomic DNA. BMC Genomics. 2022;23:554.
Sanchez-Illana A, Pineiro-Ramos JD, Sanjuan-Herraez JD, Vento M, Quintas G, Kuligowski J. Evaluation of batch effect elimination using quality control replicates in LC-MS metabolite profiling. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1019:38–48.
Kuligowski J, Perez-Guaita D, Lliso I, Escobar J, Leon Z, Gombau L, et al. Detection of batch effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry metabolomic data using guided principal component analysis. Talanta. 2014;130:442–8.
Poulos RC, Hains PG, Shah R, Lucas N, Xavier D, Manda SS, et al. Strategies to enable large-scale proteomics for reproducible research. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3793.
Jiang F, Liu Q, Li Q, Zhang S, Qu X, Zhu J, et al. Signal drift in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and its internal standard calibration strategy for quantitative analysis. Anal Chem. 2020;92:7690–8.
Brenes A, Hukelmann J, Bensaddek D, Lamond AI. Multibatch TMT reveals false positives, batch effects and missing values. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2019;18:1967–80.
Bell AW, Deutsch EW, Au CE, Kearney RE, Beavis R, Sechi S, et al. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods. 2009;6:423–30.
Tian S, Zhan D, Yu Y, Liu M, Wang Y, Song L, et al. Quartet protein reference materials and datasets for multi-platform assessment of label-free proteomics. Genome Biol. 2023;24:202.
Zhang N, Chen Q, Zhang P, Zhou K, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. Quartet metabolite reference materials for inter-laboratory proficiency test and data integration of metabolomics profiling. Genome Biol. 2024;25:34.
Siskos AP, Jain P, Romisch-Margl W, Bennett M, Achaintre D, Asad Y, et al. Interlaboratory reproducibility of a targeted metabolomics platform for analysis of human serum and plasma. Anal Chem. 2017;89:656–65.
Goh WWB, Wong L. Advanced bioinformatics methods for practical applications in proteomics. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:347–55.
Ren L, Duan X, Dong L, Zhang R, Yang J, Gao Y, et al. Quartet DNA reference materials and datasets for comprehensively evaluating germline variant calling performance. Genome Biol. 2023;24:270.
Pan B, Ren L, Onuchic V, Guan M, Kusko R, Bruinsma S, et al. Assessing reproducibility of inherited variants detected with short-read whole genome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2022;23:2.
Sahraeian SME, Mohiyuddin M, Sebra R, Tilgner H, Afshar PT, Au KF, et al. Gaining comprehensive biological insight into the transcriptome by performing a broad-spectrum RNA-seq analysis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:59.
Frohlich K, Brombacher E, Fahrner M, Vogele D, Kook L, Pinter N, et al. Benchmarking of analysis strategies for data-independent acquisition proteomics using a large-scale dataset comprising inter-patient heterogeneity. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2622.
O’Rawe J, Jiang T, Sun G, Wu Y, Wang W, Hu J, et al. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med. 2013;5:28.
Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383:166–75.
Ren L, Shi L, Zheng Y. Reference materials for improving reliability of multiomics profiling. Phenomics. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43657-023-00153-7. in press.
Sheng Q, Vickers K, Zhao S, Wang J, Samuels DC, Koues O, et al. Multi-perspective quality control of illumina RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Funct Genomics. 2017;16:194–204.
Manimaran S, Selby HM, Okrah K, Ruberman C, Leek JT, Quackenbush J, et al. BatchQC: interactive software for evaluating sample and batch effects in genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3836–8.
Liu X, Li N, Liu S, Wang J, Zhang N, Zheng X, et al. Normalization methods for the analysis of unbalanced transcriptome data: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:358.
Wu Y, Li L. Sample normalization methods in quantitative metabolomics. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1430:80–95.
Quartet Project Team. Quartet RNA reference materials improve the quality of transcriptomic data through ratio-based profiling. Dataset. Open archive for miscellaneous data (OMIX). 2023. https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/omix/release/OMIX002254.
Quartet Project Team. Visualization of diagnsitics of batch effects. 2023. GitHub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8101796.
van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learning Res. 2008;9:2579–605.
Diaz-Papkovich A, Anderson-Trocme L, Gravel S. A review of UMAP in population genetics. J Hum Genet. 2021;66:85–91.
Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, Dutertre CA, Kwok IWH, Ng LG, et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:38–44.
Kobak D, Berens P. The art of using t-SNE for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5416.
Gandolfo LC, Speed TP. RLE plots: visualizing unwanted variation in high dimensional data. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191629.
Bushel P. Principal variance component analysis. 2021. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/software/biostatistics/pvca/index.cfm.
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–20.
Varma S. Blind estimation and correction of microarray batch effect. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0231446.
Reese SE, Archer KJ, Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ, Vachon CM, de Andrade M, et al. A new statistic for identifying batch effects in high-throughput genomic data that uses guided principal component analysis. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2877–83.
Buttner M, Miao Z, Wolf FA, Teichmann SA, Theis FJ. A test metric for assessing single-cell RNA-seq batch correction. Nat Methods. 2019;16:43–9.
Korsunsky I, Millard N, Fan J, Slowikowski K, Zhang F, Wei K, et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods. 2019;16:1289–96.
Azizi E, Carr AJ, Plitas G, Cornish AE, Konopacki C, Prabhakaran S, et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2018;174(1293–1308):e1236.
Hubert L, Arabie P. Comparing partitions. J Classif. 1985;2:193–218.
Batool F, Hennig C. Clustering with the average Silhouette width. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2021;158:107190.
Albrecht S, Sprang M, Andrade-Navarro MA, Fontaine JF. seqQscorer: automated quality control of next-generation sequencing data using machine learning. Genome Biol. 2021;22:75.
Parker HS, Leek JT. The practical effect of batch on genomic prediction. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2012;11:Article 10.
Shi L, Campbell G, Jones WD, Campagne F, Wen Z, Walker SJ, et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:827–38.
Handelman GS, Kok HK, Chandra RV, Razavi AH, Huang S, Brooks M, et al. Peering into the black box of artificial intelligence: evaluation metrics of machine learning methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212:38–43.
Zhang Y, Jenkins DF, Manimaran S, Johnson WE. Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:262.
Ni Z, Sun P, Zheng J, Wu M, Yang C, Cheng M, et al. JNK signaling promotes bladder cancer immune escape by regulating METTL3-mediated m6A modification of PD-L1 mRNA. Cancer Res. 2022;82:1789–802.
He YY, Xie XM, Zhang HD, Ye J, Gencer S, van der Vorst EPC, et al. Identification of hypoxia induced metabolism associated genes in pulmonary hypertension. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:753727.
Nakayama M, Marchi H, Dmitrieva AM, Chakraborty A, Merl-Pham J, Hennen E, et al. Quantitative proteomics of differentiated primary bronchial epithelial cells from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and control identifies potential novel host factors post-influenza A virus infection. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:957830.
Acharjee A, Hazeldine J, Bazarova A, Deenadayalu L, Zhang J, Bentley C, et al. Integration of metabolomic and clinical data improves the prediction of intensive care unit length of stay following major traumatic injury. Metabolites. 2021;12:12.
Stein CK, Qu P, Epstein J, Buros A, Rosenthal A, Crowley J, et al. Removing batch effects from purified plasma cell gene expression microarrays with modified ComBat. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:63.
Adamer MF, Bruningk SC, Tejada-Arranz A, Estermann F, Basler M, Borgwardt K. reComBat: batch-effect removal in large-scale multi-source gene-expression data integration. Bioinform Adv. 2022;2:vbac071.
Zhang Y, Parmigiani G, Johnson WE. ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data.NAR. Genom Bioinform. 2020;2:lqaa078.
Leek JT, Storey JD. Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:1724–35.
Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:882–3.
Lee S, Sun W, Wright FA, Zou F. An improved and explicit surrogate variable analysis procedure by coefficient adjustment. Biometrika. 2017;104:303–16.
Parker HS, Leek JT, Favorov AV, Considine M, Xia X, Chavan S, et al. Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2757–63.
Chakraborty S, Datta S, Datta S. svapls: an R package to correct for hidden factors of variability in gene expression studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:236.
Leek JT. svaseq: removing batch effects and other unwanted noise from sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:e161.
Karpievitch YV, Taverner T, Adkins JN, Callister SJ, Anderson GA, Smith RD, et al. Normalization of peak intensities in bottom-up MS-based proteomics using singular value decomposition. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2573–80.
Crowell AM, Greene CS, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Learning and imputation for mass-spec bias reduction (LIMBR). Bioinformatics. 2019;35:1518–26.
Karpievitch YV, Nikolic SB, Wilson R, Sharman JE, Edwards LM. Metabolomics data normalization with EigenMS. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e116221.
Risso D, Ngai J, Speed TP, Dudoit S. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:896–902.
Molania R, Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Dobrovic A, Speed TP. A new normalization for Nanostring nCounter gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:6073–83.
Salim A, Molania R, Wang J, De Livera A, Thijssen R, Speed TP. RUV-III-NB: normalization of single cell RNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:e96.
De Livera AM, Sysi-Aho M, Jacob L, Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Castillo S, Simpson JA, et al. Statistical methods for handling unwanted variation in metabolomics data. Anal Chem. 2015;87:3606–15.
Haghverdi L, Lun ATL, Morgan MD, Marioni JC. Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:421–7.
Zou B, Zhang T, Zhou R, Jiang X, Yang H, Jin X, et al. deepMNN: deep learning-based single-cell RNA sequencing data batch correction using mutual nearest neighbors. Front Genet. 2021;12:708981.
Wu Y, Zhang K. Tools for the analysis of high-dimensional single-cell RNA sequencing data. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:408–21.
Li H, Brouwer CR, Luo W. A universal deep neural network for in-depth cleaning of single-cell RNA-Seq data. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1901.
Li X, Wang K, Lyu Y, Pan H, Zhang J, Stambolian D, et al. Deep learning enables accurate clustering with batch effect removal in single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2338.
Lotfollahi M, Wolf FA, Theis FJ. scGen predicts single-cell perturbation responses. Nat Methods. 2019;16:715–21.
Lopez R, Regier J, Cole MB, Jordan MI, Yosef N. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Methods. 2018;15:1053–8.
Editorial Board. Sequencing benchmarked. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1027.
Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, Shippy R, Warrington JA, Baker SC, et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1151–61.
Mercer TR, Xu J, Mason CE, Tong W. The Sequencing Quality Control 2 study: establishing community standards for sequencing in precision medicine. Genome Biol. 2021;22:306.
Reis ALM, Deveson IW, Madala BS, Wong T, Barker C, Xu J, et al. Using synthetic chromosome controls to evaluate the sequencing of difficult regions within the human genome. Genome Biol. 2022;23:19.
Fang LT, Zhu B, Zhao Y, Chen W, Yang Z, Kerrigan L, et al. Establishing community reference samples, data and call sets for benchmarking cancer mutation detection using whole-genome sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1151–60.
Gong B, Li D, Kusko R, Novoradovskaya N, Zhang Y, Wang S, et al. Cross-oncopanel study reveals high sensitivity and accuracy with overall analytical performance depending on genomic regions. Genome Biol. 2021;22:109.
Deveson IW, Gong B, Lai K, LoCoco JS, Richmond TA, Schageman J, et al. Evaluating the analytical validity of circulating tumor DNA sequencing assays for precision oncology. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1115–28.
Foox J, Nordlund J, Lalancette C, Gong T, Lacey M, Lent S, et al. The SEQC2 epigenomics quality control (EpiQC) study. Genome Biol. 2021;22:332.
Wang YW, Lêcao KA. Managing batch effects in microbiome data. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21:1954–70.
Fachrul M, Méric G, Inouye M, Pamp SJ, Salim A. Assessing and removing the effect of unwanted technical variations in microbiome data. Sci Rep. 2022;12:22236.
Ling WD, Lu JY, Zhao N, Lulla A, Plantinga AM, Fu WJ, et al. Batch effects removal for microbiome data via conditional quantile regression. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5418.
Wang YW, Cao KAL. PLSDA-batch: a multivariate framework to correct for batch effects in microbiome data. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24(2):bbac622.
Add Comment