Scientific Papers

Digital endpoints in clinical trials: emerging themes from a multi-stakeholder Knowledge Exchange event | Trials


  • National Health Service. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-long-term-plan/ [accessed Apr 12, 2024].

  • Health and Social Care Committee. Digital transformation in the NHS, Eighth Report of Session 2022–23. 2023 Jun. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmhealth/223/report.html [accessed Apr 12, 2024].

  • Fazey I, Bunse L, Msika J, Pinke M, Preedy K, Evely AC, Lambert E, Hastings E, Morris S, Reed MS. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;25:204–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tako A, Kotiadis K. A facilitation workshop for the implementation stage: A case study in health care. Loughborough University. Conference Contribution. ; 2016. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2134/21820 [accessed Apr 13, 2024].

  • Prihodova L, Guerin S, Kernohan WG. Knowledge transfer and exchange frameworks in health and their applicability to palliative care: scoping review protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(7):1717–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12642.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dukhanin V, Wolff JL, Salmi L, Harcourt K, Wachenheim D, Byock I, Gonzales MJ, Niehus D, Parshley M, Reay C, Epstein S, Mohile S, Farrell TW, Supiano MA, Jajodia A, DesRoches CM. Co-Designing an Initiative to Increase Shared Access to Older Adults’ Patient Portals: Stakeholder Engagement. J Med Internet Res. 2023;22(25):e46146. https://doi.org/10.2196/46146.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • König LM, Allmeta A, Perski O, Smit ES, Newby K, Vandelanotte C, Poduval S, Gordon L, Gültzow T, Alblas M, Arden-Close E, Braun M, Greffin K, Hewitt RM, Knox L, Mccallum C, Mclaren T. Towards meaningful interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral digital health collaborations: Challenges and action-oriented solutions. 2024. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/d9zx7.

  • Prihodova L, Guerin S, Tunney C, Kernohan WG. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(2):313–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13836.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abdolkhani R, Gray K, Borda A, DeSouza R. Quality Assurance of Health Wearables Data: Participatory Workshop on Barriers, Solutions, and Expectations. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(1):e15329. https://doi.org/10.2196/15329.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Landers M, Dorsey R, Saria S. Digital Endpoints: Definition, Benefits, and Current Barriers in Accelerating Development and Adoption. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(3):216–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517885.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robertson L, Newman J, Clayton S, Ferguson M, Pepke-Zaba J, Cannon J, Sheares K, Taboada D, Bunclark K, Armstrong I, Ferrer Mallol E, Davies EH, Toshner M. The Digital 1-Minute Walk Test: A New Patient-centered Cardiorespiratory Endpoint. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202310-1855LE.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • King CS, Flaherty KR, Glassberg MK, Lancaster L, Raghu G, Swigris JJ, Argula RG, Dudenhofer RA, Ettinger NA, Feldman J, Johri S, Fernandes P, Parsley E, Shah PS, Nathan SD. A Phase-2 Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial of INOpulse in Patients with Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Requiring Oxygen. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022;19(4):594–602 (PMID:34678128).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwartzberg L. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Time Is Ripe for Integration Into Patient Care and Clinical Research. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;36:e89–96. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_158749.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jha A, Menozzi E, Oyekan R, Latorre A, Mulroy E, Schreglmann SR, Stamate C, Daskalopoulos I, Kueppers S, Luchini M, Rothwell JC, Roussos G, Bhatia KP. The CloudUPDRS smartphone software in Parkinson’s study: cross-validation against blinded human raters. NPJ Parkinsons Dis Nature Research. 2020;6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-020-00135-w.

  • Robertson L, Newman J, Clayton S, Ferguson M, Pepke-Zaba J, Cannon J, Sheares K, Taboada D, Bunclark K, Armstrong I, Mallol EF, Davies EH, Toshner M. The Digital 1-Minute Walk Test: A New Patient-centered Cardiorespiratory Endpoint. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202310-1855LE.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vayena E, Blasimme A, Sugarman J. Decentralised clinical trials: ethical opportunities and challenges. Lancet Digital Health. Elsevier Ltd; 2023. p. e390–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00052-3.

  • Graña Possamai C, Ravaud P, Ghosn L, Tran VT. Use of wearable biometric monitoring devices to measure outcomes in randomized clinical trials: a methodological systematic review. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):310.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DiMasi JA, Dirks A, Smith Z, Valentine S, Goldsack JC, Metcalfe T, Grewal U, Leyens L, Conradi U, Karlin D, Maloney L, Getz KA, Hartog B. Assessing the net financial benefits of employing digital endpoints in clinical trials. medRxiv. 2024;2024.03.07.24303937. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.07.24303937.

  • Duran C, Fishburn N, Sample M. How clinical innovation is helping to reduce the environmental impact of clinical trials. 2023. Available from: https://www.astrazeneca.com/what-science-can-do/topics/clinical-innovation/clinical-innovation-driving-sustainable-clinical-trials.html [accessed Mar 14, 2024].

  • European Medicines Agency. Draft Qualification Opinion for Stride velocity 95th centile as primary endpoint in studies in ambulatory Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy studies. 2023;31(February).

  • Food and Drug Administration. Digital Health Technologies for Remote Data Acquisition in Clinical Investigations. 2023. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/digital-health-technologies-remote-data-acquisition-clinical-investigations [accessed Mar 18, 2024].

  • Burton H, Brigden T, Flewitt A, Blandford A. Digital Health for Remote Monitoring and Self-Management : A Roadmapping Workshop. 2017;(November):1–33. Available from: http://www.fast-healthcare.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FAST-Digital-Health-Report.pdf.

  • Krukowski RA, Ross KM, Western MJ, Cooper R, Busse H, Forbes C, Kuntsche E, Allmeta A, Silva AM, John-Akinola YO, König LM. Digital health interventions for all? Examining inclusivity across all stages of the digital health intervention research process. Trials. 2024;25(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07937-w.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leyens L, Northcott CA, Maloney L, McCarthy M, Dokuzova N, Pfister T. Why Language Matters in Digital Endpoint Development: Harmonized Terminology as a Key Prerequisite for Evidence Generation. Digit Biomark. 2024;11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000534954.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Servais L, Camino E, Clement A, McDonald CM, Lukawy J, Lowes LP, Eggenspieler D, Cerreta F, Strijbos P. First Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Digital Endpoint in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Impact for Patients and for Drug Development in Neuromuscular Diseases. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(2):183–90. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517411.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodriguez-Villa E, Torous J. Regulating digital health technologies with transparency: the case for dynamic and multi-stakeholder evaluation. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1447-x.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirkham JJ, Williamson P. Core outcome sets in medical research. BMJ Medicine BMJ. 2022;1(1):e000284. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000284.

  • Aiyegbusi OL, Cruz Rivera S, Roydhouse J, Kamudoni P, Alder Y, Anderson N, Baldwin RM, Bhatnagar V, Black J, Bottomley A, Brundage M, Cella D, Collis P, Davies E-H, Denniston AK, Efficace F, Gardner A, Gnanasakthy A, Golub RM, Hughes SE, Jeyes F, Kern S, King-Kallimanis BL, Martin A, McMullan C, Mercieca-Bebber R, Monteiro J, Peipert JD, Quijano-Campos JC, Quinten C, Rantell KR, Regnault A, Sasseville M, Schougaard LMV, Sherafat-Kazemzadeh R, Snyder C, Stover AM, Verdi R, Wilson R, Calvert MJ. Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment. Nat Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02827-9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yorke J, Deaton C, Campbell M, McGowen L, Sephton P, Kiely DG, Armstrong I. Symptom severity and its effect on health-related quality of life over time in patients with pulmonary hypertension: A multisite longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018;5(1):e000263. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000263.

  • Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, Hinder S, Fahy N, Procter R, Shaw S. Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khadjesari Z, Boufkhed S, Vitoratou S, et al. Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review. Implementation Sci. 2020;15:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01027-6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Micó-Amigo ME, Bonci T, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Ullrich M, Kirk C, Soltani A, Küderle A, Gazit E, Salis F, Alcock L, Aminian K, Becker C, Bertuletti S, Brown P, Buckley E, Cantu A, Carsin AE, Caruso M, Caulfield B, Cereatti A, Chiari L, D’Ascanio I, Eskofier B, Fernstad S, Froehlich M, Garcia-Aymerich J, Hansen C, Hausdorff JM, Hiden H, Hume E, Keogh A, Kluge F, Koch S, Maetzler W, Megaritis D, Mueller A, Niessen M, Palmerini L, Schwickert L, Scott K, Sharrack B, Sillén H, Singleton D, Vereijken B, Vogiatzis I, Yarnall AJ, Rochester L, Mazzà C, Del Din S. Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):78 PMID:37316858.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Remoortel H, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, Burtin C, Louvaris Z, Gimeno-Santos E, Langer D, Glendenning A, Hopkinson NS, Vogiatzis I, Peterson BT, Wilson F, Mann B, Rabinovich R, Puhan MA, Troosters T. Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review Systematic review Introduction. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012. Available from: http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/84.

  • Airlie J, Forster A, Birch KM. An investigation into the optimal wear time criteria necessary to reliably estimate physical activity and sedentary behaviour from ActiGraph wGT3X+ accelerometer data in older care home residents. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):136 PMID:35177023.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Terwee CB. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17(1):449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lisi E, Abellan JJ. Statistical analysis of actigraphy data with generalised additive models. Pharm Stat Wiley. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2350

  • Harrison F, Goodman A, Sluijs E, Andersen L, Cardon G, Davey R, Janz K, Molloy L, Page A, Pate R, Puder J, Sardinha L, Timperio A, Wedderkopp N, Jones A. Weather and children’s physical activity; How and why do relationships vary between countries? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017;14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0526-7.

  • Harrison F, Van Sluijs EMF, Corder K, Ekelund U, Jones A. The changing relationship between rainfall and children’s physical activity in spring and summer: a longitudinal study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:41.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Argha A, Savkin A, Liaw ST, Celler BG. Effect of seasonal variation on clinical outcome in patients with chronic conditions: Analysis of the commonwealth scientific and industrial research organization (csiro) national telehealth trial. JMIR Med Inform 2018;20(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.9680.

  • Di J, Demanuele C, Kettermann A, Karahanoglu FI, Cappelleri JC, Potter A, Bury D, Cedarbaum JM, Byrom B. Considerations to address missing data when deriving clinical trial endpoints from digital health technologies. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;113:106661. PMID:34954098.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tackney MS, Cook DG, Stahl D, Ismail K, Williamson E, Carpenter J. A framework for handling missing accelerometer outcome data in trials. Trials. 2021;22(1):1–18 (PMID:34090494).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tackney MS, Williamson E, Cook DG, Limb E, Harris T, Carpenter J. Multiple imputation approaches for epoch-level accelerometer data in trials. Stat Methods Med Res. 2023;32(10):1936–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802231188518.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium. SDTM. 2024. Available from: https://www.cdisc.org/standards/foundational/sdtm [accessed Apr 28, 2024].

  • Griffiths J, Fox L, Williamson PR. Quantifying the carbon footprint of clinical trials: guidance development and case studies. BMJ Open. 2024;14(1):e075755. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075755.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Muurling M, Pasmooij AMG, Koychev I, Roik D, Froelich L, Schwertner E, Religa D, Abdelnour C, Boada M, Almici M, Galluzzi S, Cardoso S, de Mendonça A, Owens AP, Kuruppu S, Gjestsen MT, Lazarou I, Gkioka M, Tsolaki M, Diaz A, Gove D, Visser PJ, Aarsland D, Lucivero F, de Boer C. Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0285807.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tigard DW, Braun M, Breuer S, Ritt K, Fiske A, McLennan S, Buyx A. Toward best practices in embedded ethics: Suggestions for interdisciplinary technology development. Rob Auton Syst. 2023;167:104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2023.104467.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McLennan S, Fiske A, Celi LA, Müller R, Harder J, Ritt K, Haddadin S, Buyx A. An embedded ethics approach for AI development. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2(9):488–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0214-1.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rochester L, Mazzà C, Mueller A, Caulfield B, McCarthy M, Becker C, Miller R, Piraino P, Viceconti M, Dartee WP, Garcia-Aymerich J, Aydemir AA, Vereijken B, Arnera V, Ammour N, Jackson M, Hache T, Roubenoff R. A Roadmap to Inform Development, Validation and Approval of Digital Mobility Outcomes: The Mobilise-D Approach. Digit Biomark. 2020;4(suppl 1):13–27. https://doi.org/10.1159/000512513.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Coran P, Goldsack JC, Grandinetti CA, Bakker JP, Bolognese M, Dorsey ER, Vasisht K, Amdur A, Dell C, Helfgott J, Kirchoff M, Miller CJ, Narayan A, Patel D, Peterson B, Ramirez E, Schiller D, Switzer T, Wing L, Forrest A, Doherty A. Advancing the Use of Mobile Technologies in Clinical Trials: Recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Digit Biomark. 2019;3(3):145–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503957.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldsack JC, Dowling AV, Samuelson D, Patrick-Lake B, Clay I. Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514730.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nordgreen T, Rabbi F, Torresen J, Skar YS, Guribye F, Inal Y, Flobakk E, Wake JD, Mukhiya SK, Aminifar A, Myklebost S, Lundervold AJ, Kenter R, Hammar Å, Nordby E, Kahlon S, Tveit Sekse RJ, Griffin KF, Jakobsen P, Pham MH, Côté-Allard U, Noori FM, Lamo Y. Challenges and possible solutions in cross-disciplinary and cross-sectorial research teams within the domain of e-mental health. J Enabling Technol Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.; 2021;15(4):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-03-2021-0013.

  • Goldsack JC, Coravos A, Bakker JP, Bent B, Dowling A V, Fitzer-Attas C, Godfrey A, Godino JG, Gujar N, Izmailova E, Manta C, Peterson B, Vandendriessche B, Wood WA, Wang KW, Dunn J. Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs). NPJ Digit Med Springer US; 2020;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0260-4.

  • Papoulias S, Callard F. “A limpet on a ship”: Spatio-temporal dynamics of patient and public involvement in research. Health Expect. 2021;24(3):810–8 PMID:33745192.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caron-Flinterman FJ, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG. Patient partnership in decision-making on biomedical research: Changing the Network. Sci Technol Human Values. 2007;32(3):339–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906298354.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Danish National Centre for Ethics. Guidance on decentralised clinical trials (DCT). Available from: https://nationaltcenterforetik.dk/Media/638001319248700745/Guidance%20on%20decentralised%20clinical%20trials%20Version%201%20Danish%20National%20Center%20for%20Ethics.pdf [accessed Feb 15, 2024].

  • Petrini C, Mannelli C, Riva L, Gainotti S, Gussoni G. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): A few ethical considerations. 2022.

  • Kotiadis K, Tako A. A Tutorial on Involving Stakeholders in Facilitated Simulation Studies. Proceedings of SW21 The OR Society Simulation Workshop Operational Research Society; 2021. https://doi.org/10.36819/SW21.005.

  • Tako AA, Kotiadis K. PartiSim: A multi-methodology framework to support facilitated simulation modelling in healthcare. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;244(2):555–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.046.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Horst M, Davies SR, Irwin A. Reframing Science Communication. In: Felt U, Fouché R, Miller CA, Smith-Doerr L, editors. Handbook of science and technology Studies Fourth. Cambridge/London: MIT Press; 2017. p. 881–907.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward V, Smith S, House A, Hamer S. Exploring knowledge exchange: A useful framework for practice and policy. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(3):297–304 (PMID:22014420).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link