Scientific Papers

Microbiome composition as a potential predictor of longevity in rabbits | Genetics Selection Evolution

Description of Image

  • Essl A. Longevity in dairy cattle breeding: a review. Livest Prod Sci. 1998;57:79–89.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Colditz IG, Hine BC. Resilience in farm animals: biology, management, breeding, and implications for animal welfare. Anim Prod Sci. 2016;56:1961–83.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elgersma GG, De Jong G, van der Linde R, Mulder HA. Fluctuations in milk yield are heritable and can be used as a resilience indicator to breed healthy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:1240–50.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berghof TVL, Bovenhuis H, Mulder HA. Body weight deviations as indicator for resilience in layer chickens. Front Genet. 2019;10:1216.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Putz AM, Harding JCS, Dyck MK, Fortin F, Plastow GS, Dekkers JCM, et al. Novel resilience phenotypes using feed intake data from a natural disease challenge model in wean-to-finish pigs. Front Genet. 2019;9:660.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Poppe M, Veerkamp RF, van Pelt ML, Mulder HA. Exploration of variance, autocorrelation, and skewness of deviations from lactation curves as resilience indicators for breeding. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103:1667–84.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cartuche Macas L, Pascual M, Gómez EA, Blasco A. Economic weights in rabbit meat production. World Rabbit Sci. 2014;22:165–77.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gullón JV, Gestión técnica COGAL 2019–2022. In: COGAL. 2023. http://cogal.net/pdf/2023.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2023.

  • Rosell JM. Technical Note: Health status of commercial rabbitries in the Iberian Peninsula. A practitioner’s study. World Rabbit Sci. 2003;11:157–69.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Serenius T, Stalder KJ. Genetics of length of productive life and lifetime prolificacy in the Finnish landrace and large white pig populations. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:3111–7.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • López-Serrano M, Reinsch N, Looft H, Kalm E. Genetic correlations of growth, backfat thickness and exterior with stayability in large white and landrace sows. Livest Prod Sci. 2000;64:121–31.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • García ML, Gunia M, Argente MJ. Genetic factors of functional traits. World Rabbit Sci. 2021;29:207–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berghof TVL, Poppe M, Mulder HA. Opportunities to improve resilience in animal breeding programs. Front Genet. 2019;9:692.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blasco A, Martínez-Álvaro M, García ML, Ibáñez-Escriche N, Argente MJ. Selection for genetic environmental sensitivity of litter size in rabbits. Genet Sel Evol. 2017;49:48.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Willing BP, Van Kessel AG. Host pathways for recognition: establishing gastrointestinal microbiota as relevant in animal health and nutrition. Livest Sci. 2010;133:82–91.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Delzenne NM, Cani PD. Gut microbiota and the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11:154–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dibner JJ, Knight CD, Kitchell ML, Atwell CA, Downs AC, Ivey FJ. Early feeding and development of the immune system in neonatal poultry. J Appl Poult Res. 1998;7:425–36.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bauer E, Williams BA, Smidt H, Verstegen MWA, Mosenthin R. Influence of the gastrointestinal microbiota on development of the immune system in young animals. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2006;7:35–51.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diaz Carrasco JM, Casanova NA, Fernández Miyakawa ME. Microbiota, gut health and chicken productivity: what is the connection? Microorganisms. 2019;7:374.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marchesi JR, Ravel J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome. 2015;3:31.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weishaar R, Wellmann R, Camarinha-Silva A, Rodehutscord M, Bennewitz J. Selecting the hologenome to breed for an improved feed efficiency in pigs-a novel selection index. J Anim Breed Genet. 2020;137:14–22.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Christensen OF, Börner V, Varona L, Legarra A. Genetic evaluation including intermediate omics features. Genetics. 2021;219: iyab130.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sánchez JP, Theilgaard P, Mínguez C, Baselga M. Constitution and evaluation of a long-lived productive rabbit line. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:515–25.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El Nagar AG, Baselga M, Mínguez C, Santacreu MA, Sánchez JP. Functional longevity in five rabbit lines founded on different criteria: comparison at foundation and at fixed times after selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2021;138:508–17.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.

  • Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 2017;11:2639–43.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1949.


    Google Scholar
     

  • DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5069–72.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol. 1966;13:131–44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 1957;27:325–49.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaccard P. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat. 1908;44:223–70.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Casto-Rebollo C, Argente MJ, García ML, Pena R, Blasco A, Ibáñez-Escriche N. Selection for environmental variance shifted the gut microbiome composition driving animal resilience. Microbiome. 2023;11:147.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greenacre M, Martínez-Álvaro M, Blasco A. Compositional data analysis of microbiome and any-Omics datasets: a validation of the additive logratio transformation. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 727398.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lê Cao KA, Boitard S, Besse P. Sparse PLS discriminant analysis: biologically relevant feature selection and graphical displays for multiclass problems. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:253.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galindo-Prieto B, Eriksson L, Trygg J. Variable influence on projection (VIP) for orthogonal projections to latent structures (OPLS). J Chemom. 2014;28:623–32.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Broadhurst DI, Kell DB. Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics. 2006;2:171–96.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Golland P, Liang F, Mukherjee S, Panchenko D. Permutation tests for classification. In: Auer P, Meir R, editors. Learning theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 501–15.

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blasco A. Bayesian data analysis for animal scientists: the Basics. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist Sci. 1992;7:457–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crowley EJ, King JM, Wilkinson T, Worgan HJ, Huson KM, Rose MT, et al. Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0165779.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abecia L, Rodríguez-Romero N, Yañez-Ruiz DR, Fondevila M. Biodiversity and fermentative activity of caecal microbial communities in wild and farm rabbits from Spain. Anaerobe. 2012;18:344–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xing Y, Liu J, Lu F, Wang L, Li Y, Ouyang C. Dynamic distribution of gallbladder microbiota in rabbit at different ages and health states. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0211828.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Binda C, Lopetuso LR, Rizzatti G, Gibiino G, Cennamo V, Gasbarrini A. Actinobacteria: a relevant minority for the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50:421–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cotozzolo E, Cremonesi P, Curone G, Menchetti L, Riva F, Biscarini F, et al. Characterization of bacterial microbiota composition along the gastrointestinal tract in rabbits. Animals (Basel). 2020;11:31.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Combes S, Fortun-Lamothe L, Cauquil L, Gidenne T. Engineering the rabbit digestive ecosystem to improve digestive health and efficacy. Animal. 2013;7:1429–39.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bergamaschi M, Tiezzi F, Howard J, Huang YJ, Gray KA, Schillebeeckx C, et al. Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine. Microbiome. 2020;8:110.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jørgensen SF, Trøseid M, Kummen M, Anmarkrud JA, Michelsen AE, Osnes LT, et al. Altered gut microbiota profile in common variable immunodeficiency associates with levels of lipopolysaccharide and markers of systemic immune activation. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:1455–65.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fouhse J, Zijlstra RT, Willing BP. The role of gut microbiota in the health and disease of pigs. Anim Front. 2016;6:306.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moya A, Ferrer M. Functional redundancy-induced stability of gut microbiota subjected to disturbance. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:402–13.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, Sun Q, Bukowski R, Bell JT, et al. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 2015;16:191.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bonder MJ, Kurilshikov A, Tigchelaar EF, Mujagic Z, Imhann F, Vila AV, et al. The effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1407–12.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I. The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome. 2018;6:78.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo ZQ, Wang B, Lu JZ, Li CY, Kuang LD, Tang XX, et al. Analysis of the relationship between caecal flora difference and production performance of two rabbit species by high-throughput sequencing. Czech J Anim Sci. 2021;66:271–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gryaznova MV, Syromyatnikov MY, Dvoretskaya YD, Solodskikh SA, Klimov NT, Mikhalev VI, et al. Microbiota of cow’s milk with udder pathologies. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1974.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sánchez JP, de la Fuente LF, Rosell JM. Health and body condition of lactating females on rabbit farms. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:2353–61.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodrich JK, Davenport ER, Beaumont M, Jackson MA, Knight R, Ober C, et al. Genetic determinants of the gut microbiome in UK twins. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:731–43.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Description of Image

    Source link