Scientific Papers

A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study | Health Research Policy and Systems


  • Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3:32.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract JPHMP. 2008;14:117–23.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21:1055–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trenchard-Mabere E. The emergence of systems thinking in behaviour change: a public health focus. In: Spotswood F, editor. Behav Change Key Issues Interdiscip Approaches Future Dir. Policy Press; 2016 https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447317555.003.0013

  • Finegood DT, Johnston LM, Steinberg M, Matteson CL, Deck PB. Complexity, systems thinking, and health behavior change. Health Behav Change Popul. Baltimore, MD, US: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2014. p. 435–58.

  • Verloigne M, Altenburg T, Cardon G, Chinapaw M, Dall P, Deforche B, et al. Making co-creation a trustworthy methodology for closing the implementation gap between knowledge and action in health promotion: the Health CASCADE project. Zenodo; 2022. https://zenodo.org/record/6817196

  • Messiha K. D1.1—ESR1 Preliminary Synthesis. 2021; https://zenodo.org/record/6818098. Accessed 23 Sep 2022.

  • Gibbons M. Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science. Sci Public Policy. 2000;27:159–63.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, DiMatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005;1:189–99.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green LW, O’Neill M, Westphal M, Morisky D. The challenges of participatory action research for health promotion. Promot Educ. 1996;3:3–5.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lyon AR, Munson SA, Renn BN, Atkins DC, Pullmann MD, Friedman E, et al. Use of Human-centered design to improve implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies in low-resource communities: protocol for studies applying a framework to assess usability. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8: e14990.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. Aligning implementation and user-centered design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: results from a concept mapping study. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:17.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9:1057–64.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, Lyon AR. Integrating implementation and user-centred design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: protocol from a concept mapping study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17:1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flaspohler PD, Meehan C, Maras MA, Keller KE. Ready, willing, and able: developing a support system to promote implementation of school-based prevention programs. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:428–44.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:44–53.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Commun Psychol. 2008;41:171–81.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94:392–429.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vargas C, Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Allender S. Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health—a perspective on definition and distinctions. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32:3222211.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374: n2061.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anneke van Dijk-de Vries, Anita Stevens, Trudy van der Weijden, Anna Beurskens. How to support a co-creative research approach in order to foster impact. The development of a Co-creation Impact Compass for healthcare researchers. PLOS ONE. 2020;

  • Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343: d5928.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kolb WL. A dictionary of the social sciences. New York: Free Press of Glencoe; 1964.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, Altenburg TM, Cardon G, Chinapaw MJM, et al. Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:2.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Polese F, Mele C, Gummesson E. Value co-creation as a complex adaptive process. J Serv Theory Pract. 2017;27:926–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith N, Georgiou M, Jalali MS, Chastin S. Planning, implementing and governing systems-based co-creation: the DISCOVER framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024;22:1–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bednarczyk RA, Chamberlain A, Mathewson K, Salmon DA, Omer SB. Practice-, provider-, and patient-level interventions to improve preventive care: development of the P3 Model. Prev Med Rep. 2018;11:131–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Best A, Stokols D, Green LW, Leischow S, Holmes B, Buchholz K. An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. Am J Health Promot AJHP. 2003;18:168–76.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cambon L, Alla F. Understanding the complexity of population health interventions: assessing intervention system theory (ISyT). Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19:95.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694–6.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen HT. The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: a new perspective for program evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 2010;33:205–14.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub. Co.; 1991.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gurewich D, Garg A, Kressin NR. Addressing social determinants of health within healthcare delivery systems: a framework to ground and inform health outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:1571–5.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hennessey Lavery S, Smith ML, Esparza AA, Hrushow A, Moore M, Reed DF. The community action model: a community-driven model designed to address disparities in health. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:611–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hyner GC. A procedural model for planning and evaluating behavioral interventions. Methods Inf Med. 2005;44:299–302.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jolley G, Lawless A, Hurley C. Framework and tools for planning and evaluating community participation, collaborative partnerships and equity in health promotion. Health Promot J Aust Off J Aust Assoc Health Promot Prof. 2008;19:152–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care QHC. 1998;7:149–58.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lo K, Karnon J. in-DEPtH framework: evidence- in formed, co-creation framework for the D esign, E valuation and P rocuremen t of H ealth services. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e026482.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marckmann G, Schmidt H, Sofaer N, Strech D. Putting public health ethics into practice: a systematic framework. Front Public Health. 2015;3:23.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Masso M, Quinsey K, Fildes D. Evolution of a multilevel framework for health program evaluation. Aust Health Rev Publ Aust Hosp Assoc. 2017;41:239–45.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MMWR. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 1999; 48: 1–40.

  • Nguyen DTK, McLaren L, Oelke ND, McIntyre L. Developing a framework to inform scale-up success for population health interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5:18.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Connor-Fleming ML, Parker E, Higgins H, Gould T. A framework for evaluating health promotion programs. Health Promot J Aust Off J Aust Assoc Health Promot Prof. 2006;17:61–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Racher FE, Annis RC. Community health action model: health promotion by the community. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22:182–91.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Titler MG. Translation science and context. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2010;24:35–55.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C, NCCDPHP Work Group on Translation. An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to action framework. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8:A46.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zucca C, Long E, Hilton J, McCann M. Appraising the implementation of complexity approaches within the public health sector in Scotland an assessment framework for pre-implementation policy evaluation. Front Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.653588.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wimbush E, Watson J. An evaluation framework for health promotion: theory. Quality Effectiveness Evaluat. 2000;6:301–21.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann. 1969;35:216–24.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verleye K. The co-creation experience from the customer perspective: its measurement and determinants. Dr Elina Jaakkola AH and DLA-S, editor. J Serv Manag. 2015;26:321–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moore GF, Evans RE. What theory, for whom and in which context? Reflections on the application of theory in the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions. SSM Popul Health. 2017;3:132–5.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Planning, implementing and governing systems-based co-creation: the DISCOVER framework

  • Amit G, Singal Peter DR, Higgins Akbar K, Waljee,. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014;5(1):e45. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2013.13

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braun V, Clarke V. Usingthematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Albers B, Nilsen P, Broder-Fingert S, Mukasa B, Aarons GA. Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Evaluation: A Systematic Approach

  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82(4):581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link